Understanding the model representation of clouds based on visible and infrared satellite observations

Author(s)
Stefan Geiss, Leonhard Scheck, Alberto de Lozar, Martin Weissmann
Abstract

There is a rising interest in improving the representation of clouds in numerical weather prediction models. This will directly lead to improved radiation forecasts and, thus, to better predictions of the increasingly important production of photovoltaic power. Moreover, a more accurate representation of clouds is crucial for assimilating cloud-affected observations, in particular high-resolution observations from instruments on geostationary satellites. These observations can also be used to diagnose systematic errors in the model clouds, which are influenced by multiple parameter-isations with many, often not well-constrained, parameters. In this study, the benefits of using both visible and infrared satellite channels for this purpose are demonstrated. We focus on visible and infrared Meteosat SEVIRI (Spinning Enhanced Visible InfraRed Imager) images and their model equivalents computed from the output of the ICON-D2 (ICOsahedral Non-hydrostatic, development version based on version 2.6.1; Zangl et al., 2015) convection-permitting, limited area numerical weather prediction model using efficient forward operators. We analyse systematic deviations between observed and synthetic satellite images derived from semi-free hindcast simulations for a 30 d summer period with strong convection. Both visible and infrared satellite observations reveal significant deviations between the observations and model equivalents. The combination of infrared brightness temperature and visible reflectance facilitates the attribution of individual deviations to specific model shortcomings. Furthermore, we investigate the sensitivity of model-derived visible and infrared observation equivalents to modified model and visible forward operator settings to identify dominant error sources. Estimates of the uncertainty of the visible forward operator turned out to be sufficiently low; thus, it can be used to assess the impact of model modifications. Results obtained for various changes in the model settings reveal that model assumptions on subgrid-scale water clouds are the primary source of systematic deviations in the visible satellite images. Visible observations are, therefore, well-suited to constrain subgrid cloud settings. In contrast, infrared channels are much less sensitive to the subgrid clouds, but they can provide information on errors in the cloud-top height.

Organisation(s)
Department of Meteorology and Geophysics
External organisation(s)
Meteorological Service of Germany, Hans Ertel Centre for Weather Research
Journal
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Volume
21
Pages
12273-12290
No. of pages
18
ISSN
1680-7316
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12273-2021
Publication date
07-2021
Peer reviewed
Yes
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
105206 Meteorology
Keywords
ASJC Scopus subject areas
Atmospheric Science
Sustainable Development Goals
SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy, SDG 13 - Climate Action
Portal url
https://ucris.univie.ac.at/portal/en/publications/understanding-the-model-representation-of-clouds-based-on-visible-and-infrared-satellite-observations(059823b3-2a16-4e4a-9990-5b2ec57046c5).html